“Intracytoplasmic sperm injection” başlıklı çalışmaların bilim haritalama yöntemi ile analizi
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7312835Anahtar Kelimeler:
İntrasitoplazmik sperm enjeksiyonu, ICSI, Infertilite, Bibliyometrik Analiz, Bilim HaritalamaÖzet
Amaç: İntrasitoplazmik sperm enjeksiyonu (ICSI), şiddetli erkek faktörlü kısırlık başta olmak üzere infertilite tedavisinde kullanılan en yaygın yardımcı üreme teknolojisi yöntemidir. Bu çalışma ile ICSI konusundaki yayınların kapsayıcı yapısının, araştırma temalarının evriminin, araştırma yönelimlerinin ve coğrafi yayılımının belirlenmesi amaçlanmış ve bu doğrultuda bibliyometrik bilim haritalama kullanılmıştır. Gereç-Yöntem: Araştırma kapsamında WoS veri tabanı incelenmiş ve arama kriterlerine uyan 2379 makale analize tabii tutulmuştur. Veri setindeki çalışmalar; dergiler, araştırmacılar, ilişkili konular ve ülkeler açısından incelenmiştir. Bulgular: ICSI konusunda ilk makalenin 1993 yılında yayınlandığı, 1998 yılına kadar makale sayısında ciddi bir artış eğilimi olduğu ve en çok 2021 yılında üretildiği tespit edilmiştir. Yayın sayısı ve atıfları açısından bu alanda en etkili yazarın Belçikalı araştırmacı “Prof.Dr. Paul Devroey (Free University of Brussels)” olduğu, Belçikalı araştırmacıların ilk sıralarda yer aldığı bulunmuştur. “Human Reproduction”, atıf ve indeksleri açısından bu alanda en etkili dergidir. “IVF”, “Pregnancy” ve “Infertility”, ICSI ile birlikte en sık kullanılan kelimelerdir. “High fertilization and implantation rates after intracytoplasmic sperm injection” isimli çalışma en fazla atıf alan çalışmadır. Tek ülkeli, çok ülkeli ve toplam yayın sayısında ABD ilk sırada yer almış olup; Çin, Belçika, Türkiye ve İtalya önde gelen ülkeler arasındadır. Ülkeler arası işbirliği açısından bakıldığında ise en sık İtalya-İspanya ve Hollanda- Belçika kökenli akademisyenler arasında ortak yayın yapıldığı görülmektedir. Sonuç: Bu çalışma sonuçlarının, ICSI hakkında farkındalık oluşturacağı ve araştırmacılara ışık tutacağı değerlendirilmektedir.
Referanslar
Devroey P, Van Steirteghem A. A review of ten years experience of ICSI. Hum Reprod Update. 2004;10:19–28.
Esteves SC. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection versus conventional IVF. Lancet. 2021;397(10284):1521-1523.
Palermo G, Joris H, Devroey P, Van Steirteghem AC. Pregnancies after intracytoplasmic injection of single spermatozoon into an oocyte. Lancet. 1992;340:17–18.
O'Neill CL, Chow S, Rosenwaks Z, Palermo GD. Development of ICSI. Reproduction. 2018;156(1):F51-F58.
Boulet SL, Mehta A, Kissin DM, Warner L, Kawwass JF, Jamieson DJ. Trends in use of and reproductive outcomes associated with intracytoplasmic sperm injection. JAMA. 2015;313(3):255-263.
Ch De Geyter, C Calhaz-Jorge, MS Kupka, C Wyns, E Mocanu, T Motrenko, et al, The European IVF-monitoring Consortium (EIM) for the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE), ART in Europe, 2014: results generated from European registries by ESHRE: The European IVF-monitoring Consortium (EIM) for the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE), Hum Reprod. 2018;33(9): 1586–1601
Esteves SC, Roque M, Bedoschi G, Haahr T, Humaidan P. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection for male infertility and consequences for offspring. Nat Rev Urol. 2018; 15: 535–562.
de Mouzon J, Chambers GM, Zegers-Hochschild F, Mansour R, Ishihara O, Banker M, et al. International committee for monitoring assisted reproductive technologies world report: assisted reproductive technology 2012. Hum Reprod. 2020; 35(8): 1900–1913.
Johnson LN, Sasson IE, Sammel MD, Dokras A. Does intracytoplasmic sperm injection improve the fertilization rate and decrease the total fertilization failure rate in couples with well-defined unexplained infertility? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2013;100(3):704-711.
Foong SC, Fleetham JA, O'Keane JA, Scott SG, Tough SC, Greene CA. A prospective randomized trial of conventional in vitro fertilization versus intracytoplasmic sperm injection in unexplained infertility. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2006;23(3):137-140.
Practice Committees of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine and the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) for non-male factor indications: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2020;114(2):239-245.
Esteves SC, Yarali H, Vuong LN, Carvalho JF, Ozbek IY, Polat M, et al. Low prognosis by the POSEIDON criteria in women undergoing assisted reproductive technology: a multicenter and multinational prevalence study of over 13000 patients. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021; 12: 630550.
Tararbit K, Lelong N, Thieulin AC, Houyel L, Bonnet D, Goffinet F, et al. The risk for four specific congenital heart defects associated with assisted reproductive techniques: a population-based evaluation. Hum Reprod. 2013;28:367–374.
Stern JE, Nangia AK. When do we use intracytoplasmic sperm injection? Fertil Steril. 2020;114(4):746-747.
Franasiak JM, Polyzos NP, Neves AR, Yovich JL, Ho TM, Vuong LN, et al. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection for all or for a few? Fertil Steril. 2022;117(2):270-284.
Baysal YE. Pediatric nephrotic syndrome with science mapping method. J Soc Anal Health. 2022;2(2):62-67.
Kurutkan MN, Orhan F. Kalite Prensiplerinin Görsel Haritalama Tekniğine Göre Bibliyometrik Analizi. Ankara: SAGE Publications Ltd., 2018.
Chen C. Science mapping: A systematic review of the literature. J Data Inf Sci. 2017;2(2):1–40.
Andersen N, Swami V. Science mapping research on body image: A bibliometric review of publications in Body Image, 2004–2020. Body Image. 2021;38:106-119.
Ma X, Zhang L, Wang J, Luo Y. Knowledge domain and emerging trends on echinococcosis research: a scientometric analysis. Int J Environ Res. 2019;16 (5). 842.
Aria M, Cuccurullo C. Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. J Informetr. 2017;11:959–975.
Kamdem JP, Duarte AE, Lima KRR, Rocha JBT, Hassan W, Barros LM, et al. Research trends in food chemistry: A bibliometric review of its 40 years anniversary (1976–2016). Food Chem. 2019;294:448–457.
Egghe L. Theory and practice of the g-index. Scientometrics. 2006;69(1):131–152.
Nowak JK, Lubarski K, Kowalik LM, Walkowiak J. H-index in medicine is driven by original research. Croat Med J. 2018;59(1):25–32.
Orimoloye IR, Ololade OO. Potential implications of gold-mining activities on some environmental components: a global assessment (1990 to 2018). J King Saud Univ. 2020;32(4):2432–2438.
Zheng X, Le Y, Chan APC, Hu Y, Li Y. Review of the application of social network analysis (SNA) in construction project management research. Int J Proj Manag. 2016;34:1214–1225.
Callon M, Courtial JP, Laville F. Co-word analysis as a tool for describing the network of interactions between basic and technological research: The case of polymer chemsitry. Scientometrics. 1991;22(1):155–205.
Schöggl J-P, Stumpf L, Baumgartner RJ. The narrative of sustainability and circular economy-A longitudinal review of two decades of research. Resour Conserv Recycl. 2020;163:105073.
Nasir A, Shaukat K, Hameed IA, Luo S, Alam TM, Iqbal F. A bibliometric analysis of corona pandemic in social sciences: A review of influential aspects and conceptual structure. IEEE Access. 2020;8:133377–133402.
Cobo MJ, López-Herrera AG, Herrera-Viedma E, Herrera F. Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol. 2011;62(7):1382–1402.
Schmidt M. The sankey diagram in energy and material flow management. J Ind Ecol. 2008;12:82–94.
Yao Q, Chen K, Yao L, Lyu P, Yang T, Luo F, et al. Scientometric trends and knowledge maps of global health systems research. Health Res Policy Syst. 2014;12:26.
Van Steirteghem AC, Nagy Z, Joris H, Liu J, Staessen C, Smitz J, et al. High fertilization and implantation rates after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod. 1993;8(7):1061-1066.
Secinaro S, Calandra D, Petricean D, Chmet F. Social finance and banking research as a driver for sustainable development: A bibliometric analysis. Sustainability. 2021;13(1): 330.
Haddad M, Stewart J, Xie P, Cheung S, Trout A, Keating D, et al. Thoughts on the popularity of ICSI. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021;38(1):101-123.
Bosch E, Espinós JJ, Fabregues F, Fontes J, García-Velasco J, Llácer J, et al. Spanish infertility SWOT group (SISG). Always ICSI? A SWOT analysis. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2020;37(9):2081-2092.
Nyboe Andersen A, Carlsen E, Loft A. Trends in the use of intracytoplasmatic sperm injection marked variability between countries. Hum Reprod Update. 2008;14(6):593-604.
Sunderam S, Kissin DM, Crawford SB,Suzanne GF, Denise JJ, Warner L, et al. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance – United States, 2013. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2015; 64(11):1–25.
Sullivan-Pyke CS, Senapati S, Mainigi MA, Barnhart KT. In Vitro fertilization and adverse obstetric and perinatal outcomes. Semin Perinatol. 2017;41(6):345-353.
Sunderam S, Kissin DM, Crawford SB, Folger SG, Boulet SL, Warner L, et al. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance - United States, 2015. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2018;67(3):1-28.
Van Steirteghem AC, Liu J, Joris H, Nagy Z, Janssenswillen C, Tournaye H, et al. Higher success rate by intracytoplasmic sperm injection than by subzonal insemination. Report of a second series of 300 consecutive treatment cycles. Hum Reprod. 1993;8(7):1055-1060.
Nagy ZP, Liu J, Joris H, Verheyen G, Tournaye H, Camus M, et al. The result of intracytoplasmic sperm injection is not related to any of the three basic sperm parameters. Hum Reprod. 1995;10(5):1123-1129.
İndir
Yayınlanmış
Nasıl Atıf Yapılır
Sayı
Bölüm
Lisans
Telif Hakkı (c) 2022 Journal of Social and Analytical Health
Bu çalışma Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License ile lisanslanmıştır.
JSOAH, 