Analysis of “Intracytoplasmic sperm injection” titled studies with science mapping method
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7312835Keywords:
Intracytoplasmic sperm injection, ICSI, Infertility, Bibliometric Analysis, Science MappingAbstract
Aim: Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) is the most commonly used assisted reproductive technology method in the treatment of infertility, especially for the severe male factor infertility. This study aimed to determine the inclusive structure of articles about ICSI, the evolution of research themes, the research tendencies and their geographical distribution. Bibliometric science mapping was used for this purpose. Materials-Methods: Within the scope of the research, the WoS database was examined and a total number of 2379 articles, matching the search criteria, were analyzed. Studies in the data set were in terms of journals, researchers, related topics and countries. Results: It has been determined that the first article about ICSI was published in 1993, a serious increase in the number of articles was observed until 1998 and the largest number of articles were published in 2021. The most influential author in this field in terms of number of publications and citations was found as a Belgian researcher “Prof. Paul Devroey (Free University of Brussels)” and Belgian researchers were found to be in the first place. “Human Reproduction” is the most influential journal in this field in terms of citations and indexing. “IVF”, “Pregnancy” and “Infertility”, are the most commonly used words along with ICSI. The study named “High fertilization and implantation rates after intracytoplasmic sperm injection” is the most cited study. The USA ranked first in the number of single-country, multi-country and total publications. China, Belgium, Turkey and Italy are also among the leading countries. When the publications are examined in terms of cooperation between countries, it is seen that the joint publications are most commonly conducted between Italian-Spain and Dutch-Belgian academics. Conclusion: It is considered that the results of this study will raise awareness about ICSI and shed light on researchers.
References
Devroey P, Van Steirteghem A. A review of ten years experience of ICSI. Hum Reprod Update. 2004;10:19–28.
Esteves SC. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection versus conventional IVF. Lancet. 2021;397(10284):1521-1523.
Palermo G, Joris H, Devroey P, Van Steirteghem AC. Pregnancies after intracytoplasmic injection of single spermatozoon into an oocyte. Lancet. 1992;340:17–18.
O'Neill CL, Chow S, Rosenwaks Z, Palermo GD. Development of ICSI. Reproduction. 2018;156(1):F51-F58.
Boulet SL, Mehta A, Kissin DM, Warner L, Kawwass JF, Jamieson DJ. Trends in use of and reproductive outcomes associated with intracytoplasmic sperm injection. JAMA. 2015;313(3):255-263.
Ch De Geyter, C Calhaz-Jorge, MS Kupka, C Wyns, E Mocanu, T Motrenko, et al, The European IVF-monitoring Consortium (EIM) for the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE), ART in Europe, 2014: results generated from European registries by ESHRE: The European IVF-monitoring Consortium (EIM) for the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE), Hum Reprod. 2018;33(9): 1586–1601
Esteves SC, Roque M, Bedoschi G, Haahr T, Humaidan P. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection for male infertility and consequences for offspring. Nat Rev Urol. 2018; 15: 535–562.
de Mouzon J, Chambers GM, Zegers-Hochschild F, Mansour R, Ishihara O, Banker M, et al. International committee for monitoring assisted reproductive technologies world report: assisted reproductive technology 2012. Hum Reprod. 2020; 35(8): 1900–1913.
Johnson LN, Sasson IE, Sammel MD, Dokras A. Does intracytoplasmic sperm injection improve the fertilization rate and decrease the total fertilization failure rate in couples with well-defined unexplained infertility? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2013;100(3):704-711.
Foong SC, Fleetham JA, O'Keane JA, Scott SG, Tough SC, Greene CA. A prospective randomized trial of conventional in vitro fertilization versus intracytoplasmic sperm injection in unexplained infertility. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2006;23(3):137-140.
Practice Committees of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine and the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) for non-male factor indications: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2020;114(2):239-245.
Esteves SC, Yarali H, Vuong LN, Carvalho JF, Ozbek IY, Polat M, et al. Low prognosis by the POSEIDON criteria in women undergoing assisted reproductive technology: a multicenter and multinational prevalence study of over 13000 patients. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021; 12: 630550.
Tararbit K, Lelong N, Thieulin AC, Houyel L, Bonnet D, Goffinet F, et al. The risk for four specific congenital heart defects associated with assisted reproductive techniques: a population-based evaluation. Hum Reprod. 2013;28:367–374.
Stern JE, Nangia AK. When do we use intracytoplasmic sperm injection? Fertil Steril. 2020;114(4):746-747.
Franasiak JM, Polyzos NP, Neves AR, Yovich JL, Ho TM, Vuong LN, et al. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection for all or for a few? Fertil Steril. 2022;117(2):270-284.
Baysal YE. Pediatric nephrotic syndrome with science mapping method. J Soc Anal Health. 2022;2(2):62-67.
Kurutkan MN, Orhan F. Kalite Prensiplerinin Görsel Haritalama Tekniğine Göre Bibliyometrik Analizi. Ankara: SAGE Publications Ltd., 2018.
Chen C. Science mapping: A systematic review of the literature. J Data Inf Sci. 2017;2(2):1–40.
Andersen N, Swami V. Science mapping research on body image: A bibliometric review of publications in Body Image, 2004–2020. Body Image. 2021;38:106-119.
Ma X, Zhang L, Wang J, Luo Y. Knowledge domain and emerging trends on echinococcosis research: a scientometric analysis. Int J Environ Res. 2019;16 (5). 842.
Aria M, Cuccurullo C. Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. J Informetr. 2017;11:959–975.
Kamdem JP, Duarte AE, Lima KRR, Rocha JBT, Hassan W, Barros LM, et al. Research trends in food chemistry: A bibliometric review of its 40 years anniversary (1976–2016). Food Chem. 2019;294:448–457.
Egghe L. Theory and practice of the g-index. Scientometrics. 2006;69(1):131–152.
Nowak JK, Lubarski K, Kowalik LM, Walkowiak J. H-index in medicine is driven by original research. Croat Med J. 2018;59(1):25–32.
Orimoloye IR, Ololade OO. Potential implications of gold-mining activities on some environmental components: a global assessment (1990 to 2018). J King Saud Univ. 2020;32(4):2432–2438.
Zheng X, Le Y, Chan APC, Hu Y, Li Y. Review of the application of social network analysis (SNA) in construction project management research. Int J Proj Manag. 2016;34:1214–1225.
Callon M, Courtial JP, Laville F. Co-word analysis as a tool for describing the network of interactions between basic and technological research: The case of polymer chemsitry. Scientometrics. 1991;22(1):155–205.
Schöggl J-P, Stumpf L, Baumgartner RJ. The narrative of sustainability and circular economy-A longitudinal review of two decades of research. Resour Conserv Recycl. 2020;163:105073.
Nasir A, Shaukat K, Hameed IA, Luo S, Alam TM, Iqbal F. A bibliometric analysis of corona pandemic in social sciences: A review of influential aspects and conceptual structure. IEEE Access. 2020;8:133377–133402.
Cobo MJ, López-Herrera AG, Herrera-Viedma E, Herrera F. Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol. 2011;62(7):1382–1402.
Schmidt M. The sankey diagram in energy and material flow management. J Ind Ecol. 2008;12:82–94.
Yao Q, Chen K, Yao L, Lyu P, Yang T, Luo F, et al. Scientometric trends and knowledge maps of global health systems research. Health Res Policy Syst. 2014;12:26.
Van Steirteghem AC, Nagy Z, Joris H, Liu J, Staessen C, Smitz J, et al. High fertilization and implantation rates after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod. 1993;8(7):1061-1066.
Secinaro S, Calandra D, Petricean D, Chmet F. Social finance and banking research as a driver for sustainable development: A bibliometric analysis. Sustainability. 2021;13(1): 330.
Haddad M, Stewart J, Xie P, Cheung S, Trout A, Keating D, et al. Thoughts on the popularity of ICSI. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021;38(1):101-123.
Bosch E, Espinós JJ, Fabregues F, Fontes J, García-Velasco J, Llácer J, et al. Spanish infertility SWOT group (SISG). Always ICSI? A SWOT analysis. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2020;37(9):2081-2092.
Nyboe Andersen A, Carlsen E, Loft A. Trends in the use of intracytoplasmatic sperm injection marked variability between countries. Hum Reprod Update. 2008;14(6):593-604.
Sunderam S, Kissin DM, Crawford SB,Suzanne GF, Denise JJ, Warner L, et al. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance – United States, 2013. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2015; 64(11):1–25.
Sullivan-Pyke CS, Senapati S, Mainigi MA, Barnhart KT. In Vitro fertilization and adverse obstetric and perinatal outcomes. Semin Perinatol. 2017;41(6):345-353.
Sunderam S, Kissin DM, Crawford SB, Folger SG, Boulet SL, Warner L, et al. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance - United States, 2015. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2018;67(3):1-28.
Van Steirteghem AC, Liu J, Joris H, Nagy Z, Janssenswillen C, Tournaye H, et al. Higher success rate by intracytoplasmic sperm injection than by subzonal insemination. Report of a second series of 300 consecutive treatment cycles. Hum Reprod. 1993;8(7):1055-1060.
Nagy ZP, Liu J, Joris H, Verheyen G, Tournaye H, Camus M, et al. The result of intracytoplasmic sperm injection is not related to any of the three basic sperm parameters. Hum Reprod. 1995;10(5):1123-1129.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Journal of Social and Analytical Health
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
JSOAH is licensed under a 