Comparison of subtalar angle, Q angle, trunk endurance and physical performance in ındividuals with pes planus and controls
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7197473Keywords:
Pes planus, Xbox 360Kinect, Performance, Subtalar angle, pes planus, Xbox 360Kinect, performance, subtalar angle, q angleAbstract
Aim: Pes planus is a health problem that develops due to the decrease in the height of the medial longitudinal arch (MLA) and affects the individual negatively in daily life by causing changes in the foot and trunk alignment. This study aimed to compare subtalar angle, Q angle, trunk endurance, and physical performance in individuals with pes planus and controls. Materials and Methods: Volunteers who did not have any history of surgery related to the lower extremities between the ages of 18-35 were divided into two groups as pes planus and control group. A total of 57 people, 28 from the pes planus group and 29 from the control group were included in the study. Subtalar Angle and Q Angle was determined with universal goniometer, Mcgill Trunk Flexion, Extension and Lateral Bridge Test was used to evaluate trunk endurance, and Xbox 360Kinect™ game console was used to evaluate physical performance. Results: The left subtalar angle was higher in individuals with pes planus (p<0.05). The groups were found to be similar in terms of right and left Q angles (p>0.05). There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of trunk endurance values (p>0.05). Discus throw distances of individuals with pes planus were higher than healthy controls (p<0.05). There was no significant difference physical performances (p>0.05). Conclusion: Pes planus can negatively affect individuals in terms of subtalar angle and physical performance. Therefore, individuals with pes planus should be evaluated in terms of subtalar angle and physical performance during the rehabilitation process.
References
Parry I, Carbullido C, Kawada J, Bagley A, Sen S, Greenhalgh D, et al. Keeping up with video game technology: Objective analysis of Xbox Kinect™ and PlayStation 3 Move™ for use in burn rehabilitation. Burns. 2014;40 (5):852-9.
Dahl-Popolizio S, Loman J, Cordes CC. Comparing outcomes of Kinect videogame-based occupational/physical therapy versus usual care. Games For Health: Research, Development, Clin Applications. 2014;3(3):157-61.
McKeon PO, Hertel J, Bramble D, Davis I. The foot core system: a new paradigm for understanding intrinsic foot muscle function. Br J Sports Med. 2015;49(5):290-295.
Springer S, Yogev Seligmann, G. Validity of the kinect for gait assessment: A focused review. Sensors. 2016; 16(2): 194-207.
Diego-Mas JA, Alcaide-Marzal J. Using Kinect™ sensor in observational methods for assessing postures at work. Applied Ergonomics. 2014; 45(4):976-985.
Clark RA, Pua YH, Fortin K, Ritchie C, Webster KE, Denehy L, et al. Validity of the Microsoft Kinect for assessment of postural control. Gait & Posture. 2012; 36(3): 372-377.
Yeung LF, Cheng KC, Fong CH, Lee WC, Tong KY. Evaluation of the Microsoft Kinect as a clinical assessment tool of body sway. Gait & Posture. 2014; 40(4): 532-538.
Clark RA, Pua YH, Oliveira CC, Bower KJ, Thilarajah S, McGaw R, et al. Reliability and concurrent validity of the Microsoft Xbox One Kinect for assessment of standing balance and postural control. Gait & Posture. 2015; 42(2):210-213.
Eltoukhy MA, Kuenze C, Oh J, Signorile JF. Validation of static and dynamic balance assessment using Microsoft Kinect for young and elderly populations. IEEE J Biomedi Health Informatics. 2017;22(1): 147-153.
Cao W, Zhong J, Cao G, He Z. Physiological function assessment based on kinect v2. IEEE Access. 2019; 105(7):638-651.
Scano A, Caimmi M, Chiavenna A, Malosio M, Tosatti LM. Kinect one-based biomechanical assessment of upper-limb performance compared to clinical scales in post-stroke patients. In 2015 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC). 2015;5720-5723.
Kheyrandish I, Hadadnejad M, Shojaedin S. Comparison of functional lower extremity evaluation scores in active adolescents with normal and flexible flat foot. The Scientific J Rehabil Medi, 2019;7(4): 198-207.
Zhao X, Tsujimoto T, Kim B, Tanaka K. Association of arch height with ankle muscle strength and physical performance in adult men. Biology of Sport. 2018; 34(2):119-126.
Lee DB, Choi JD. The effects of foot intrinsic muscle and tibialis posterior strengthening exercise on plantar pressure and dynamic balance in adults flexible pes planus. Phys Ther Korea. 2016;23(4): 27-37.
Kızılcı H, Erbahçeci F. Pes planus olan ve olmayan erkeklerde fiziksel uygunluğun değerlendirilmesi. Fizyoterapi Rehabilitasyon. 2016; 27(2): 25-33.
Kabak B, Kocahan T, Akınoğlu B, Genç A, Hasanoğlu A. Does pes planus ınfluence balance performance in athletes?. Turkish J Sports Medi. 2019; 54(3):195-201.
Vauhnik R, Turk Z, Pilih IA, Mičetić-Turk D. Intra-rater reliability of using the navicular drop test for measuring foot pronation. Hrvatski Športskomedicinski Vjesnik. 2006; 21(1):8-11.
Sabino GS, Rocha IC, Guimarães CQ, Alcântara MAd, Felício DC. Reliability analysis of the clinical application of the navicular drop test. Fisioterapia em Movimento. 2012; 25(2):301-309.
Morrison S, Durward B, Watt G, Donaldson M. Literature review evaluating the role of the navicular in the clinical and scientific examination of the foot. Br J Pod. 2004;7(4):110-114.
Smith-Oricchio K, Harris BA. Interrater reliability of subtalar neutral, calcaneal inversion and eversion. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1990; 12(1):10-15.
Otman S, Demirel H, Sade A. Tedavi Hareketlerinde Temel Değerlendirme Prensipleri. Ankara, 3. baskı, Prizma Ofset, 2003.
Toraman F, Yaman H, Tarsalı S. Patellofemoral açı farklılığının alt ekstremite performansına etkisi. J ArthropArthros Surg. 2003; 14(1);13-17.
Bliss LS, Teeple P. Core stability: the centerpiece of any training program. Currets Sports Medi Reports. 2005;4 (3):179-183.
McGill SM, Childs A, Liebenson C. Endurance time for low back stabilization exercises: clinical targets for testing and training from a normal database. Arch Phys Medi Rehabil. 1999; 80: 941-944.
Tse MA, McManus AM, Masters RSW. Development and validation of a core endurance intervention program: implications for performance in college-age rowers. J Strength Condition Res. 2005; 19: 547-552.
Mentiplay BF, Hasanki K, Perraton LG, Pua YH, Charlton PC, Clark RA. Three-dimensional assessment of squats and drop jumps using the Microsoft Xbox One Kinect: Reliability and validity. J Sports Sci. 2018;36(19): 2202-2209.
Dutta T. Evaluation of the Kinect™ sensor for 3-D kinematic measurement in the workplace. Applied Ergonomics. 2012;43(4): 645-649.
Foreman MH, Engsberg JR. The validity and reliability of the Microsoft Kinect for measuring trunk compensation during reaching. Sensors. 2020; 20(24): 70-73.
Hayran O. Sağlık Bilimlerinde Araştırma ve İstatistik Yöntemler. Ankara, Nobel Tıp Kitabevi, 2012.
Elataar FF, Abdelmajeed SF, Abdellatif N, Mohammed MM. Core muscles' endurance in flexible flatfeet: A cross- sectional study. J MusculoskeNeuronal Interactions. 2020; 20(3): 404–410.
Ginika GA, Chidiebere PO, Canice CA, Henry DA, Echezona NE. Correlation between foot arch ındex and quadriceps angle among patients with knee osteoarthritis in National Orthopaedics Hospital Enugu. African J Health Sci Techno. 2021;3(1):156-163.
Nejati P, Forogh B, Moeineddin R, Baradaran H, Najati M. Patelofemoral pain syndrome in iranian Female athletes. Article Medi Iran. 2011; 49: 169-172.
Kwon O, Yun M, Lee W. Correlation between intrinsic patellofemoral pain syndrome in young adults and lower extremity biomechanics. J Phys Ther Sci. 2014; 26(7):961-964.
Unver B, Suner Keklik S, Yildirim Sahan T, Bek N. An investigation of the effects of pes planus on distal and proximal lower extremity biomechanical parameters and low back pain. J Turk Phys Rehabil. 2019; 30(2):119-125.
Root ML, Orien WP, Weed JH. Normal and abnormal function of the foot. Los Angeles: Clin Biomechanics Corporation. 1977.
Sarrafian SK, Kelikian AS. Osteology. In A. S. Kelikian (Ed.), Anatomy of the foot and ankle (Third ed., pp. 40–119). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer/Lipppincott Williams & Wilkins, 2011.
Koh EK, Jung DY. Comparison of subtalar joint range of motion and dorsiflexor muscle activity between normal and pes planus feet. J Korean Society of Phys Medi. 2018; 13(2): 129-135.
Agoada D, Kramer PA. Radiographic measurements of the talus and calcaneus in the adult pes planus foot type. American J Phys Anthrop. 2020; 171(4): 613-627.
Seidenberg PH, Bowen JD, King DJ. (Eds.). The hip and pelvis in sports medicine and primary care. New York, Springer, 2010.
Abd El Ghafar MT, Olama KA, Ismaeel MM. Differences in lateral core muscles’ endurance measurementsb adolescents with and without flexible flat-feet. The Egyptian J Hospital Medi. 2021;85(1): 2767-2771.
Contarlı N, Çankaya T. Effect of the pes planus on vertical jump height and lower extremity muscle activation in gymnasts. Turkish J Sport Exer. 2022;24(1): 81-89.
Kumala MS, Tinduh D, Poerwandari D. Comparison of lower extremities physical performance on male young adult athletes with normal foot and flatfoot. Surabaya Phys Medi Rehabil J. 2019; 1(1): 6-13.
Bakırhan S, Elibol N, Özkeskin M, Özden F. The relationship between knee-ankle muscle strength and performance tests in young female adults with flexible pes planus. Bulletin of Faculty of Phys Ther. 2021; 26(1): 1-7.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Journal of Social and Analytical Health
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
JSOAH is licensed under a 