Investigation of the relationship between troponin and platelet levels in emergency patients: AI-based study on acute coronary syndrome

Authors

  • Ayhan Tabur SBÜ Diyarbakır Gazi Yaşargil Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Diyarbakır
  • Fatih Orhan University of Health Sciences, Gülhane Vocational School of Health, Ankara, Türkiye

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16930048

Keywords:

Artificial intelligence, machine learning, acute coronary syndrome, Troponin T, predictive

Abstract

Aim: Advancements in Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) have revolutionized the field of medical diagnostics, offering new possibilities for early detection and risk assessment of critical conditions. This study utilizes machine learning models to predict acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and evaluate its association with key biomarkers, specifically Troponin T, Platelet (PLT), and Mean Platelet Volume (MPV). The primary objective is to assess the efficiency of ML algorithms in identifying high-risk patients based on laboratory parameters and improving early intervention strategies.

 

Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 4092 patients admitted to the emergency department, of whom 3640 survived and 452 deceased. The study population consisted of 2427 male and 1665 female patients. Feature importance analysis using the Random Forest algorithm identified Troponin T, PLT, and MPV as the most critical biomarkers for predicting ACS and mortality risk. To enhance predictive accuracy, three machine learning models-Gradient Boosting, XGBoost, and Decision Tree—were implemented and evaluated. The Gradient Boosting model achieved an accuracy of 73.99% and an ROC AUC score of 0.6058, demonstrating the best overall performance. The XGBoost model followed closely with an accuracy of 69.11% and an ROC AUC score of 0.6054. The Decision Tree model exhibited the highest accuracy of 77.29%, but its ROC AUC score of 0.5623 suggested weaker sensitivity in distinguishing ACS cases. Each model was assessed based on accuracy, ROC AUC scores, confusion matrices, and classification reports.

 

Results: The findings indicate that Gradient Boosting and XGBoost models demonstrated strong predictive capabilities, with Gradient Boosting achieving the highest classification accuracy at 73.99%. Despite having the highest accuracy, the Decision Tree model exhibited a lower ROC AUC score of 0.5623, suggesting limitations in its ability to differentiate between ACS-positive and ACS-negative cases. The results further reinforce that patients with abnormal Troponin T, MPV, and PLT levels were at a significantly higher risk of developing ACS, highlighting their potential as key diagnostic markers in cardiac risk assessment.

 

Conclusion: This study underscores the importance of artificial intelligence in predicting acute coronary syndrome and emphasizes the critical role of Troponin T, PLT, and MPV as biomarkers. By integrating machine learning models into emergency healthcare settings, clinicians can identify high-risk ACS patients with greater accuracy, enabling timely interventions and reducing mortality rates. Future research should focus on incorporating advanced ensemble learning techniques (Random Forest, XGBoost, Deep Learning) and additional clinical variables to enhance predictive performance further. AI-driven diagnostic models can play a vital role in improving early ACS detection, optimizing patient care, and transforming emergency medicine with data-driven decision-making.

References

Rubinger L, Gazendam A, Ekhtiari S, Bhandari M. Machine learning and artificial intelligence in research and healthcare. Injury. 2023;54: S69-S73.

Ahmed Z, Mohamed K, Zeeshan S, Dong X. Artificial intelligence with multi-functional machine learning platform development for better healthcare and precision medicine. Database (Oxford). 2020;2020:baaa010.

van der Schaar M, Alaa AM, Floto A, Gimson A, Scholtes S, Wood A, et al. How artificial intelligence and machine learning can help healthcare systems respond to COVID-19. Mach Learn. 2021;110(1):1-14.

Jones LD, Golan D, Hanna SA, Ramachandran M. Artificial intelligence, machine learning and the evolution of healthcare: A bright future or cause for concern? Bone Joint Res. 2018;7(3):223-225.

Bergmark BA, Mathenge N, Merlini PA, Lawrence-Wright MB, Giugliano RP. Acute coronary syndromes. Lancet. 2022;399(10332):1347-1358.

Makki N, Brennan TM, Girotra S. Acute coronary syndrome. J Intensive Care Med. 2015;30(4):186-200.

Overbaugh KJ. Acute coronary syndrome. Am J Nurs. 2009;109(5):42-52.

Savonitto S, Ardissino D, Granger CB, Morando G, Prando MD, Mafrici A, et al. Prognostic value of the admission electrocardiogram in acute coronary syndromes. JAMA. 1999;281(8):707-713.

Wang H, Zu Q, Chen J, Yang Z, Ahmed MA. Application of artificial intelligence in acute coronary syndrome: a brief literature review. Adv Ther. 2021;38(10):5078-5086.

Iannattone PA, Zhao X, VanHouten J, Garg A, Huynh T. Artificial intelligence for diagnosis of acute coronary syndromes: a meta-analysis of machine learning approaches. Can J Cardiol. 2020;36(4):577-583.

Lippi G, Filippozzi L, Salvagno GL, Montagnana M, Franchini M, Guidi GC, et al. Increased mean platelet volume in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2009;133(9):1441-1443.

Pal R, Bagarhatta R, Gulati S, Rathore M, Sharma N. Mean platelet volume in patients with acute coronary syndromes: a supportive diagnostic predictor. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014;8(8):MC01-4.

Wang X, Xu XL, Li XM, Zhao R, Yang X, Cong HL. Diagnostic value of mean platelet volume combined with troponin I for acute coronary syndrome. Am J Med Sci. 2016;352(2):159-165.

Aryanto D, Isnanta R, Safri Z, Hasan R. Diagnostic value of mean platelet volume (MPV) to troponin T inpatients with acute coronary syndrome. IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci. 2018;125(1):012122.

Ahamed H, Henry RA, Pai R. Association of mean platelet volume and acute coronary syndrome. Int J Res Med Sci. 2017;5(4): 1217-1220.

Azmi SS, Baliga S. An overview of boosting decision tree algorithms utilizing AdaBoost and XGBoost boosting strategies. Int Res J Eng Technol. 2020;7(5): 6867-6870.

Wade C, Glynn K. Hands-on gradient boosting with XGBoost and scikit-learn: Perform accessible machine learning and extreme gradient boosting with Python. Packt Publishing Ltd, 2020.

Anghel A, Papandreou N, Parnell T, De Palma A, Pozidis H. Benchmarking and optimization of gradient boosting decision tree algorithms. arXiv preprint arXiv. 2018;1809.04559.

Xi Y, Zhuang X, Wang X, Nie R, Zhao G. A research and application based on gradient boosting decision tree. In Web Information Systems and Applications: 15th International Conference, WISA 2018, Taiyuan, China, September 14–15, 2018, Proceedings 15 (pp. 15-26). Springer International Publishing.

Yıldız MN, Altunok İ, Bozan Ö, Atiş ŞE, Çekmen B, Aksel G. The relationship between mean platelet volume (MPV) and cardiac troponin I (cTnI) levels and mortality in patients with ischemic stroke. Haydarpaşa Numune Med J. 2021;61(4): 451-455.

Mercan R, Demir C, Dilek İ, Asker M, Atmaca M. (2010). Mean platelet volume in acute coronary syndrome. Van Tıp Dergisi. 2010;17(3):89-95.

Ranjith MP, DivyaRaj R, Mathew D, George B, Krishnan MN. Mean platelet volume and cardiovascular outcomes in acute myocardial infarction. Heart Asia. 2016;8(1):16-20.

Ahmed MS, Uddin MJ, Popy UZ, Mohammad Ali M, Saha BP, Afroz F, et al. Association of platelet count and mean platelet volume in acute ST- elevated myocardial infarction. Bangladesh Heart J. 2023;38(2):120-126.

Downloads

Published

2025-08-23

How to Cite

Tabur, A., & Orhan, F. (2025). Investigation of the relationship between troponin and platelet levels in emergency patients: AI-based study on acute coronary syndrome. Journal of Social and Analytical Health, 5(2), 124–135. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16930048