Turkish validity and reliability study of the fatalism scale
Keywords:Fatalısm, Shen, Scale, Turkish
Aim: This methodological study was carried out to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Fatalism Scale developed by Shen.
Material and Methods: The data were collected by identifying information form and the Turkish version of the fatalism scale. The data of the study were collected from 220 individuals over the age of 18 who applied to a family health center in the city center of Erzurum for various reasons.
Results: Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) value, which determines the sampling adequacy of the scale, was 0.810, and explained variance ratio was %60,6. Regarding the fit index analysis of Shen's fatalism scale, it was determined that the ratio of chi-square statistics to degrees of freedom was (χ2 / df) 2.79 (χ2 = 465.09 df= 167), the root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) was 0.07, the Tucker-Lewis index (TLI) value was 0.91 and the comparative fit index (CFI) value was 0.92.
Conclusion: It was concluded that the fatalism scale developed by Shen is a valid and reliable measurement tool in the Turkish language.
Akhigbe A, Akhigbe K. Effects of health belief and cancer fatalism on the practice of breast cancer screening among Nigerian women. Mammography-Recent Adv. 2012;71–88.
Wittink MN, Joo JH, Lewis LM, Barg FK. Losing faith and using faith: Older African Americans discuss spirituality, religious activities, and depression. J Gen Intern Med. 2009;24(3):402–407.
Unantenne N, Warren N, Canaway R, Manderson L. The strength to cope: Spirituality and faith in chronic disease. J Relig Health. 2013;52(4):1147–1161.
Niederdeppe J, Levy AG. Fatalistic beliefs about cancer prevention and three prevention behaviors. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007;16(5):998–1003.
Franklin MD, Schlundt DG, McClellan LH, Kinebrew T, Sheats J, Belue R, vd. Religious fatalism and its association with health behaviors and outcomes. Am J Health Behav. 2007;31(6):563–572.
Sharf BF, Stelljes LA, Gordon HS. ‘A little bitty spot and I’m a big man’: patients’ perspectives on refusing diagnosis or treatment for lung cancer. Psycho-oncology. 2005;14(8):636–646.
Keeley B, Wright L, Condit CM. Functions of health fatalism: fatalistic talk as face saving, uncertainty management, stress relief and sense making. Sociol Health Illn. 2009;31(5):734–747.
Gutierrez AP, McCurley JL, Roesch SC, Gonzalez P, Castaneda SF, Penedo FJ, vd. Fatalism and hypertension prevalence, awareness, treatment and control in US Hispanics/Latinos: results from HCHS/SOL Sociocultural Ancillary Study. J Behav Med. 2017;40(2):271–280.
Uzuntarla Y, Uzuntarla F. The fatalism approaches according to the frequency of occupational accidents and other sociodemographic characteristics of health workers. Turkish Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care. 2019; 13(2): 151-158.
Ersin F, Capik C, Kissal A, Aydogdu NG, Beser A. Breast cancer fatalism scale: A validity and reliability study in Turkey. Int J Caring Sci. 2018;11(2):783.
Aydoğdu NG, Çapık C, Ersin F, Kissal A, Bahar Z. The reliability and validity of prostate cancer fatalism inventory in Turkish language. J Relig Health. 2017;56(5):1670-1682.
Bobov G, Capik C. The reliability and validity of the religious health fatalism scale in Turkish language. J Relig Health. 2020;59(2):1080–1095.
Kaya A, Bozkur B. Kadercilik eğilimi ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi: geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Mersin Univ J Fac Educ. 2015;11(3):935-946.
Shen L, Condit CM, Wright L. The psychometric property and validation of a fatalism scale. Psychol Heal. 2009;24(5):597–613.
Shen L, Condit CM. Addressing fatalism with health messages. Commun Public Heal. 2012;191–208.
Özdamar K. Ölçek ve test geliştirme yapısal eşitlik modellemesi IBM SPSS, IBM SPSS AMOS ve MINTAB uygulamalı. Eskişehir: Nisan Kitabevi. 2017;78–79.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2022 Journal of Social and Analytical Health
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.